אורן פרז (פורסם לראשונה בבלוגו 'Regulatory Paradoxes')
But can this network be
trusted? Despite recent reforms there seems to be grounds for concerns. A
report by the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU),
which looked at all the expert groups established between 20 September 2012 and
20 September 2013, criticized the Commission for failing to meet us its
commitment to reform the experts consultation process, noting that “Across all
newly created Expert Groups, there are more corporate representatives than all
other stakeholders combined” (http://www.alter-eu.org/documents/2013/11/a-year-of-broken-promises). A paper
by Robinson et al criticizes EFSA for its failure to properly regulate conflict
of interests in its risk assessment process, focusing on the example of GMO
food (Claire Robinson, et al., Conflicts of interest at the European Food
Safety Authority erode public confidence, 67 Journal of Epidemiology and
Community Health 717-720 2013). See also the European Court of
Auditors. Management of conflict of interest in selected EU agencies: Special
report no. 15. Luxembourg, 2012.
This data which could be
more easily extracted with the use of the new experts registry raises worries
of intensive influence by corporate interests on the EU expert-network.
Regulatory reaction to
this problem remains relatively thin…
0 תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה